The concept of health holds different meanings
for different people and groups.
These meanings of health have also changed over time. This change is no more evident than in Western
society today, when notions of health and health
promotion
are being challenged and expanded in new ways.
For much of recent Western history, health has
been viewed
in the physical sense only. That
is, good health has been connected to the smooth mechanical operation of the
body, while ill health has been attributed to a breakdown in this
machine. Health in this sense has been defined as the absence of disease or illness and is seen in medical
terms. According to this view,
creating health for people means providing medical care to treat or prevent disease and illness. During this period,
there was an emphasis on providing
clean water, improved sanitation and housing.
In the late 1940s the World Health Organization challenged this physically and medically oriented view of health. They stated
that 'health is a complete state of
physical, mental and social well-being and is not merely the absence of disease' (WHO, 1946). Health and the person
were seen more holistically (mind/body/spirit)
and not just in physical terms.
The 1970s was a time of focusing on the
prevention of disease and illness by emphasizing
the importance of the lifestyle and behavior of the individual. Specific behaviors which were seen to increase
risk of disease, such as smoking,
lack of fitness and unhealthy eating habits, were targeted. Creating health meant providing not only medical health
care, but health promotion programs
and policies
which would help people maintain healthy behaviors and lifestyles. While this individualistic
healthy lifestyles approach to health worked
for some (the wealthy members of society), people experiencing poverty, unemployment, underemployment or
little control over the conditions of
their daily lives benefited little from this approach. This was largely because both the healthy lifestyles
approach and the medical approach
to health largely ignored the social and environmental conditions affecting the health of people.
During 1980s and 1990s there has been a
growing swing away from seeing
lifestyle risks as the root cause of poor health. While lifestyle factors still remain important, health is being
viewed also in terms of the social, economic
and environmental contexts in which people live. This broad approach to health is called the
socio-ecological view of health. The broad socio-ecological view of health was endorsed
at the first International Conference
of Health Promotion held in 1986, Ottawa, Canada, where people from 38 countries agreed and declared that: The fundamental conditions and resources for
health are peace, shelter,
education, food, a viable income, a stable eco-system,
sustainable resources, social justice and equity. Improvement in health requires a secure
foundation in these basic
requirements. (WHO, 1986) It
is clear from this statement that the creation of health is about much more than encouraging healthy individual behaviors
and lifestyles and providing appropriate
medical care. Therefore, the creation of health must include addressing issues such as poverty, pollution, urbanization, natural resource depletion,
social alienation and poor working conditions. The social, economic and environmental contexts which contribute to
the creation of health do not operate
separately or independently of each other. Rather, they are interacting and interdependent, and it is the complex
interrelationships between them which
determine the conditions that promote health. A broad socio-ecological view of health suggests that the promotion of
health must include a strong social,
economic and environmental focus.
At the Ottawa Conference in 1986, a charter
was developed which outlined new
directions for health promotion based on the socio-ecological view of health. This charter, known as the Ottawa
Charter for Health Promotion, remains
as the backbone of health action today. In exploring the scope of health promotion it states that: Good health is a major resource for social,
economic and personal
development and an important dimension of quality of life. Political, economic, social,
cultural, environmental,
behavioural and biological factors can all favor health or be harmful to it. (WHO, 1986) The Ottawa Charter brings practical meaning
and action to this broad notion of
health promotion. It presents fundamental strategies and approaches in achieving health for all. The overall
philosophy of health promotion which guides
these fundamental strategies and approaches is one of 'enabling people to increase control over and to improve
their health' (WHO, 1986).
Questions for the text
1
1.
State the main
idea of each paragraphs
2.
What is the
meaning of those bold words in the text
3.
Where does it
refer to? Last paragraph
4.
In which year did
the World Health Organization define health in terms of mental, physical
and social well-being?
5.
Which members of society benefited most from
the healthy lifestyles approach to health?
6.
Name the three broad areas which relate to
people's health, according to the socioecological view of health.
7.
During which decade were lifestyle risks seen
as the major contributors to poor health?
Questions 6-7
Do the following statements agree with the information in Reading
Passage?
YES if the statement agrees with the information
NO if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this in the passage
8.
Doctors have been
instrumental in improving living standards in Western society.
9.
The approach to
health during the 1970s included the introduction of health awareness programs.
1.
The socio-ecological view of health recognitions
that lifestyle habits and the provision of adequate health
care are critical factors governing health.
1.
The principles of
the Ottawa Charter are considered to be out of date in the 1990s.
1.
In recent yearsa
number of additional countries have subscribed to the Ottawa Charter.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar